As we turn our local news crews’ attention back to Breezy Point on Long Island, NY once again, this time for a large whale that ended its life on the sand, it’s important to learn from history’s mistakes.

Do not, under any circumstances, try to blow it up.

I cannot get over the webcam that the New York Times stuck on the roof of their building. The pre-storm city is beautiful at just about two in the morning!

I cannot get over the webcam that the New York Times stuck on the roof of their building. The pre-storm city is beautiful at just about two in the morning!

sandyorbust:

Great shot from the nytimes building in NYC.  Image updates every 60 seconds.  Great viewing for tomorrow, depending on whether or not it remains intact. 

Well, that’s purdy. Cluck thru.

sandyorbust:

Great shot from the nytimes building in NYC.  Image updates every 60 seconds.  Great viewing for tomorrow, depending on whether or not it remains intact. 

Well, that’s purdy. Cluck thru.

"

Since 9/11, there’s been an incredible number of incidents where photographers are being interfered with and arrested for doing nothing other than taking pictures or recording video in public places.

It’s not just news photographers who should be concerned with this. I think every citizen should be concerned. Tourists taking pictures are being told by police, security guards and sometimes other citizens, “Sorry, you can’t take a picture here.” When asked why, they say, “Well, don’t you remember 9/11?”

I remember it quite well, but what does that have do to with taking a picture in public? It seems like the war on terrorism has somehow morphed into an assault on photography.

"

Criminalizing Photography - this is so important to read. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

(via jukeboxgraduate)

(Source: The New York Times, via jukeboxgraduate)

I know I’ve written about it before, but it’s always good to see new attention paid to the struggling Catskills region in upstate New York. Unfortunately I wasn’t around to see it, but I understand Grossinger’s was, once upon a time, quite the place to be.
It would have been the coolest to see my family’s name up on a big sign like that. I wonder what happened to all that stuff?

I know I’ve written about it before, but it’s always good to see new attention paid to the struggling Catskills region in upstate New York. Unfortunately I wasn’t around to see it, but I understand Grossinger’s was, once upon a time, quite the place to be.

It would have been the coolest to see my family’s name up on a big sign like that. I wonder what happened to all that stuff?

"If you give me the right idea for a program, I can give back to you a three-hour journey where, if you tune in at any time, you’re likely to hear something that will entertain you. But if you take the ride with me, when we get to the end, you’ll say, ‘Wow, what a long, strange trip it’s been.’ "

Pete Fornatale, quoted in his New York Times obituary

"The Times’ rule is, we correct anything that is wrong, no matter how small or seemingly silly."

The story behind ‘the best NYT correction ever’

(via jukeboxgraduate)

(Source: jimromenesko.com, via jukeboxgraduate)

La Guardia Airport’s old air traffic control tower.

La Guardia Airport’s old air traffic control tower.

"

There’s nothing partisan about a road or a bridge or an airport; Democrats and Republicans have voted to spend billions on them for decades and long supported rebuilding plans in their own states. On Thursday, though, when President Obama’s plan to spend $60 billion on infrastructure repairs came up for a vote in the Senate, not a single Republican agreed to break the party’s filibuster.

That’s because the bill would pay for itself with a 0.7 percent surtax on people making more than $1 million. That would affect about 345,000 taxpayers, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, adding an average of $13,457 to their annual tax bills. Protecting that elite group — and hewing to their rigid antitax vows — was more important to Senate Republicans than the thousands of construction jobs the bill would have helped create, or the millions of people who would have used the rebuilt roads, bridges and airports.

Senate Republicans filibustered the president’s full jobs act last month for the same reasons. And they have vowed to block the individual pieces of that bill that Democrats are now bringing to the floor. Senate Democrats have also accused them of opposing any good idea that might put people back to work and rev the economy a bit before next year’s presidential election.

…Mitch McConnell, the Senate Republican leader, bitterly accused Democrats of designing their infrastructure bill to fail by paying for it with a millionaire’s tax, as if his party’s intransigence was so indomitable that daring to challenge it is somehow underhanded.

The only good news is that the Democrats aren’t going to stop. There are many more jobs bills to come, including extension of unemployment insurance and the payroll-tax cut. If Republicans are so proud of blocking all progress, they will have to keep doing it over and over again, testing the patience of American voters.

"

The New York Times, “Putting Millionaires Before Jobs.”

Yep.  Specifically, Republicans.  When they fight for no tax increases, they want you to believe that they’re doing so for all income levels.  Nope.  Just for the wealthy.  Just for the fucking One Percent.

(via inothernews)

Reblogging political news, especially from ION, often feels like preaching to the choir. But this is so disgusting I feel compelled to regurgitate it.

Recently-enforced laws like the ones that caused the raid on the Gibson guitar factory could put small craftsmen out of business. They rely on decades old stockpiles of now-illegal South American and Asian woods, as well as mother of pearl and ivory, which under these laws are in the country illegally.

That means that if a musician were to take their guitar over state lines or out of the country, it could get detained at customs. If a guitar purchased out of the country made with these woods or other materials was brought back to the United States, it would not be allowed to cross the border with its owner.

That’s bad news.

youmightfindyourself:

How does one perform a vanishing act these days? In an age of smart phones and GPS — not to mention anonymity-piercing paparazzi and celebrity magazines — is it really still possible to disappear?

Absolutely, said Frank M. Ahearn, the author of the concisely titled primer “How to Disappear.” “Technology is a double-edged sword,” said Mr. Ahearn, a “skip tracing” expert who used to track missing people through credit-card and phone records and the like. “It can be used to find or to conceal. The real question is: Who’s better at technology? You or the people trying to hunt you?”

Take the case of Mr. Bulger, he suggested, the Boston gangster who, before his arrest last month in California, eluded the Federal Bureau of Investigation for nearly 16 years.

“Whitey could have easily used a social-network site to confuse the F.B.I.,” Mr. Ahearn said. “He could have written e-mails, saying, ‘Hey, I just saw Whitey in Costa Rica.’ Or he could have made a Facebook page with false, misleading chatter about his case.”

While admitting that technology can often make it easier to track a person down, Bob Burton, the president of U.S. Cobra, one of the country’s largest bounty-hunting companies, said that all you need to disappear is “a good computer and a 14-year-old kid.”

And perhaps a dead person, too.

“You look in the obituaries,” Mr. Burton said, “in Topeka, Kan., say. You want a gas station attendant more or less your age. Once you get the date of birth, you call the county. ‘Hi, I used to live in Kansas, but I’ve been living in American Samoa for the last 20 years as a Christian missionary. Any chance I could get a copy of my birth certificate?’ ”

Should your ruse succeed and the certificate arrive, simply call a motor vehicle office and apply for a driver’s license. “All you need,” Mr. Burton said, “is one good piece of ID. The rest follows after that.”

Is a signature required? “Show up with your writing hand in a sling,” he said. “That way, when you sign with your left hand, your signature’s messed up.”

Are officials troubling you for fingerprints? “There’s a nongreasy glue, like a mucilage,” he said, that is more or less invisible once applied. “You put it on your thumb. You roll your thumb over your heel. Now, you’ve got a heel print on your thumb for no one who exists.”

According to José Chavarria, the chief of domestic investigations for the United States Marshals Service, there are — conservatively speaking — a million local, state and federal fugitives at large in the country at any time. Using as a baseline a national population of 300 million, that suggests that a visit to a Times Square movie theater could put one in proximity of someone who is running from the law.

“The best way to disappear,” Chief Chavarria said, “is to cut all ties with everything and everyone you know. But it’s very, very hard to sever ties.”

J. T. Mullen, a private detective of long standing in Manhattan, recalled just such a case, one in which a New York businessman — with a love of actual running — tried to flee his wife in order to avoid divorce papers. “The first thing I do,” said Mr. Mullen, who was hired to find the man, “is go down to the New York Road Runners club. They give me a printout of the mailing list for their running magazine.” Sure enough, one name on the list could not be found in any public record.

“The guy’s at large, but he needs to read about running in New York,” Mr. Mullen said. “He couldn’t give it up. That’s how he got caught.”

Naturally, money is the other chief ingredient in a successful disappearance — and the more you have, the longer you can last underground.

Mr. Ahearn, the author, suggested creating a corporation in a state where documentation requirements are lax. A pursuer may know your name, he said, but would have a hard time tracking you if your personal expenses were paid by See Ya Later Inc. — especially if you incorporate in Wyoming or Nevada, which a recent book, “Treasure Islands,” described as having slack incorporation rules on par with those in Cyprus and the Cayman Islands.

“Then you can work and live where you want,” Mr. Ahearn said. “In Texas, Buffalo, wherever. You pay the corporation and the corporation pays the bills.”

Joe and Nancy DeFede undertook a classic vanishing act in 2002, when Mr. DeFede, a former acting boss of the Luchese crime family, turned state’s evidence and learned that there was a contract on his head. The couple entered the witness protection program, which Mrs. DeFede described in her unpublished memoir, “Life With Little Joe,” as an oppressive world of censored mail, suspicious neighbors and unmarked federal cars.

“The hardest part for me,” she said, “was becoming this kind of nonperson.” (She and Mr. DeFede now live, under assumed names, in a 55-and-over community in a sunny southern state.) “They took our documents — our Social Security cards and birth certificates. They changed our names like three different times in seven months.”

If given a chance to do it again, she would, she said, live in open sight. (Note to Ms. Anthony: the following could be relevant.)

“It’s hard to start over as a totally different person,” Mrs. DeFede said. “How do you make a résumé? How do you find a job? We lost our family, our money, everything. Disappearing is an empty, miserable life.”

42 years ago, today.

42 years ago, today.

(via bzr)

Click through. This is something everyone should read on the almost-eve of the final Space Shuttle launch this coming Friday.

(Source: inothernews)

popculturebrain:

Trailer: ‘Page One: Inside the New York Times - July 24

Directed by Andrew Rossi.

(via /Film)

(via inothernews)